CSS :: Anti Terrorism Act 1997

@ : Home > Judiciary And Law > Anti Terrorism Act 1997

161.

An appeal preferred against judgment of Anti-Terrorism Court to High Court shall be heard by

A.	Single Judge as provided in sub-section (8) of S-25	B.	Bench of Judges not less than two as provided in sub-section (9) of S-25
C.	Both (a) and (b)	D.	None of above

162.

As per section 25(10) while hearing an appeal, the Bench shall not grant more than_____ consecutive adjournments

A.	Two	B.	Three
C.	Four	D.	Five

163.

Punishment for defective investigation is dealt by

A.	Section 25-A of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997	B.	Section 26 of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997
C.	Section 26-A of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997	D.	Section 27 of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997

164.

______ Can granting punishment for defective investigation

A.	Anti-Terrorism Court	B.	High Court
C.	Both (a) and (b)	D.	None of above

165.

An investigation officer or other concerned officer who failed to investigate a case properly and diligently and failed to pursue the case properly and breached his duties, shall be punished with imprisonment for_______

A.	One year	B.	Two years
C.	Three years	D.	Five years

166.

Section______ of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997 deals with presumption of proof against accused

A.	27	B.	27-A
C.	28	D.	None of above

167.

The section ______ of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997 which deals with transfer of cases

A.	27	B.	27-A
C.	27-B	D.	28

168.

As per section 31 of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997 a judgment or order passed, or sentence awarded by an Anti-Terrorism Court, subject to the result of an appeal under this Act shall be

A.	Final	B.	Preliminary
C.	Both (a) and (b)	D.	None of above

169.

Section 33, of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997 empowers _____ with delegation of powers

A.	Anti-Terrorism Court	B.	High Court
C.	Government	D.	None of above

170.

Section 34 of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997 empowers_____ to amend the Schedule

A.	Anti-Terrorism Court	B.	High Court
C.	Supreme Court	D.	Government